Tuesday, 30 December 2008

[Progress.148] Pump Replaced

We have a guy from The Pool Clinic knocking at our door at around 8 am this morning to replace the pump for the rain water tank. Very impressed, I thought everyone was on holiday??

The company looks after all the services for the Davey products, and this guy carried this little machine with him.


I took a closer picture of it and he explained that the water will be sucked into the pump through the bottom part (marked with red arrows), and then pumped through the hole marked with blue arrow, which would somehow connected to a pipe somewhere. The yellow coloured thing floats on the water surface for it to detect the water level. There's also a small sign behind the yellow thing which says "Made in Italy", wonder if that's for the whole machine or just that part.

If you are interested in getting more information about the pump, I did a search on their web site and further information about this "Submersible sump pumps with twin impeller" is available here.

We just released most of the water a few days ago while it was raining. It took more than an hour to release all 3000+ L of water and it's quite boring watching it. I thought we have to go through the long, boring water release process again. But he just put his hand into the tank, unscrew a pipe and pull out the whole thing in about 30 seconds time. Wow! So the pump actually stays inside the tank!

As shown below, the one on the left is the replacement, the one at the right with a long white pipe connected is the malfunctioned one.

The black machine in the control box at the background of photo above (shown below), which we always thought was the pump, is actually just the "RainBank water controller". It's interesting to learn all these new things everyday!

When viewed from above the tank, the pipe highlighted in red below, is where the long pipe connects to.

He then swap the pipe over and slowly drop the pump into the tank. It actually takes more time to run the extremely long power cable around the pipes than to replace the pump! When it's all done, I could see the pump with the yellow thing floating on the water surface inside the huge tank.

Have a quick look inside the tank and as below, can see some supporting structure inside the tank.

We did a few tests to prove it's working ok, and I asked him why the mains water meter was running when I turned on the garden hose (which connects to the rain water tank)? He said the system is designed to use the water pressure from the mains to start up the system, once it's started, it will still work even if you turn off the mains. Did a few more tests and it worked exactly as he described, very interesting!

One more problem solved, yeah!

Monday, 29 December 2008

[PropertyInfo.035] Is gutter leaking problem covered by insurance?

We have a guy from ABC Seamless, one of the gutter/leaf guard company to give us a quote for a leaf guard for our gutters the other day.

During his presentation, I noticed in his folder there were some information about 2 articles (see below) from Sydney Morning Herald about some major problems with the "high-front gutters" design.

The 2 articles with quite shocking information are as below:

Gremlin behind the walls


and

Government failed to tell builders of gutter rule: Opposition


As mentioned in the articles:

"People think it's just a matter of a simple roof leak, which they can then claim through their insurance,"

"But these homes will not be repaired by insurance companies if the original work was non-compliant. This guttering is not only a breach of legislation but an act of unwitting deceit, potentially causing health and financial stress to consumers. Then they pursue us, and we face litigation for non-compliance."

"Opposition's spokeswoman on fair trading, Catherine Cusack, called the widespread installation of non-compliant guttering systems 'one of the greatest failures in Australian consumer protection history'"

From the articles, looks like there were a few things not been followed during gutter installation, such as: (1) leaving a gap between the gutter and the wall, (2) there should be overflowing slots (holes) on the gutter, but some manufacturers leave it as optional.

Also, the design of "high-front gutters" is flawed as when there's more water than it could handle, the water will naturally flows toward the back - into the house as the back of the gutter is much lower than the front.

One other option of course, would be to have a gutter that has a higher back. And that's where ABC Seamless is pushing their special "high-back gutter" product and they claim to be the only one in the industry that's supplying this product - see the "Ogee" one as highlighted below, the page of all available gutter profiles is here.


There must be other technical complications or cost/installation issues involved, otherwise I don't understand why they also sell the "flawed" high front gutters?

Regardless of all these, yes, we all know that we have to clean our gutters regularly and yes, the leaf guard would help to prevent blockage. But my main concern is, is it true that insurance company won't be covering the cost if there's any problem? What options do we have?

Hope someone with experience/knowledge in this area can help to clarify, and any comments/suggestions welcomed!

[Others.031] Family Funday Sunday - Needs futher improvement!

Yesterday was the 2nd "Family Funday Sunday" - a New South Wales Government Initiative for families to "enjoy a fun day out with unlimited travel on Sydney's buses, trains and ferries every Sunday."

We have a few overseas visitors with us yesterday and we went to a few popular places - Taronga Zoo, Sydney Aquarium, Darling Harbour, Circular Quay, ...etc. From the huge crowd of people wherever we go, seems to prove that this excellent idea was widely welcomed by lots of people -- hope it helps to generate more revenue for all the retailers as well!

But from what we experienced at the Circular Quay with the ferries, looks like there's still a few areas which can be further improved.

We got on the ferries at the Aquarium and off at the Circular Quay. Hundreds of people gathered around the 5 ticketing machines to get a ticket as otherwise can't exit through the gate.

First there was no sign about which ticket should we purchase for "Family Funday Sunday". After squeezed ourselves through the huge crowd, we then learned from one of the extremely busy staff that we should pick the yellow "pensioner" option. Ok, one problem solved.

Next, we found that we can only purchase one single ticket at a time. There were 7 of us, after inserted a $20 comes a single ticket and big pile of $2 coins as change. Then we have to repeat the process again and again and finally got all the tickets. There was another group with 10+ people around another machine, and everyone is complaining and cursing,.....etc. Certainly doesn't look like a "Funday" for sure.

When we later decided to leave Circular Quay to return to Darling Harbour by ferry on Wharf 5 around 6pm, there were hundreds of people already on the platform for a ferry to Parramatte in front of us. It wasn't a nice scene for sure, specially when the ferry arrived. People start pushing, yelling and shouting, trying to board the ferry, which was already late.

To be honest, I have never seen anything like that before in Sydney. After a while, the poor Sydney Ferry staffs were trying to control the crowd, finally managed to stop the rest of the crow from pushing through the gate as the ferry was obviously full.

There's this Indian lady screaming and yelling when the staff stopped her. Looks like some of her group was already on the ferry and she wants to get them off the ferry so they can stay together. After some more calm talking, she was allowed to enter the ferry to get her friends off the ferry. A few other lucky ones then moved in, and the ferry finally left...

We then heard the announcement: "...There's no more ferry to Paramatta for the day..." Well, that sort of explains why everyone was so desperate in trying to get on to the ferry...

But it's not the end of the world, they can still catch the train using the same ticket without paying any extra. Why risk everyone's life & safety like that? The Ferry staffs were just trying to do their job!

It was quite embarrassing and our overseas visitors certainly weren't very impressed about this kind of third world country style chaos for our public transport system...

Haven't got a chance to travel with the buses and trains yesterday, certainly hope none of the others were in such chaos like the ferries...

I can think of a few things the Sydney Ferry could have done to improve the situation:
1) improve the ticket selling system
2) control the number of people allowed to enter the platform
3) use the PA to broadcast helpful information
4) plan for the extra load and probably arrange for extra ferries on standby in case of emergencies like this
...etc.

Saturday, 27 December 2008

[Others.030] What's this pattern on the Harbour Bridge?

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year everyone!

New Year Eve is coming and today at the rocks, we can see a strange pattern been installed on the Sydney Harbour Bridge. Can't really tell what it is by looking at the pattern.


This is a closer look, can you work out what it is??


For the past few years, the fireworks and pattern on the Harbour Bridge has always been the highlights of the New Year celebration. Can't remember which year it was, the best one I have seen is the bouncing heart. Hope this NYE we can have an even more exciting one!

Happy 2009 everyone!!

Wednesday, 24 December 2008

[PropertyInfo.034] Mirror mirror on the wall, how much should I sell my house for?

I am always interested in how some owners/agents decide about how much should they ask for when putting a property on the market.

With the recent economic downturn, there were lots of mixed information every where. For example, there's this one about "Real estate agents flee industry", and this one talking about "Rising home loans could tip recovery".

I also mentioned in this post about owners trying to take advantage of the first home buyer grant and increase their selling price to a incredible level. And I just found a very good example in our suburb recently.

There was this developer who purchased a triangular shape land with an old house at the end of Willoughby Street Epping, applied for sub-division, knocked it down and build 2 modern houses. Can't remember if it's late last year or early this year, they were asking for over $920K each. Which we think it's ridiculously over priced.

If you search on the net, you might still able to find this page, which as shown below, asking for $849K each around April/May this year.


Then price dropped a lot and around Sep/Oct this year, it dropped to around $650K as shown in this page and a copy below.


Surprisingly, a few weeks ago we noticed the price rocketed to $779K! The latest ads is available here.


Based on our understanding of the market, from the size of the land and the quality, we think an acceptable price would be around $600K - $650K. Don't understand why would the owner do it like this, wasting time and effort, damaging it's reputation/image by keep on changing the price & agent every few months. All the buyers nowadays are really cautious and always do a lot of homework before making any commitment. If the owner had started within the reasonable range earlier this year, both houses could have been gone ages ago!